Published Papers
An Empirical Analysis of CFIUS: Examining Foreign Investment Regulation in the United States (2014), with Tian Huang, Yale J. of Int’l L. (available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2287503)
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) examines foreign proposed transactions to garner control of American entities and advises on national security risks through a confidential review process. Previous scholarship on CFIUS has concentrated on specific events and legislative amendments to the process. This Note, through aggregating publicly available sources of information regarding CFIUS reviews, produces the first comprehensive empirical analysis of the process. Using event studies, we show that CFIUS actions have resulted in multi-billion dollar wealth transfers to American companies. Our regression analysis of publicly available data indicates that outcomes of CFIUS reviews are best explained by factors relating to national security concerns.
Working Papers
Better Court Structure, Better Judgments: Exploring the Impact of Term Limits and Court Specialization with a Diagnostic Model of Judging in Securities Class Action Litigation (working paper available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6156667)
Court structure can influence the quality of judicial decision making, and a combination of term limits and subject matter specialization in the federal bench could avoid hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements of non-meritorious securities class action litigation matters every year. Using a variety of data related to securities class action lawsuits, I employ a structural model of expert decision making to estimate federal judges’ skill in appropriately identifying and dismissing non-meritorious strike suits and to examine how this skill increases with relevant experience and decreases with advanced age. In addition, I find that rule clarity plays a significant role in heightening the accuracy and predictability of judges’ decisions. Finally, I model counterfactual scenarios to derive the optimal length of judicial term limits and caseload for specialized subject-matter courts. I estimate that, if enacted concurrently with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act in 1995, court structure interventions at these optimal levels could have avoided over $17.2 billion in non-meritorious settlements and returned $4.5 billion to shareholders in suits that were erroneously dismissed.
Is the Optimism Tax Worth Paying? Investor Adverse Selection and Corporate Governance (working paper available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6188283)
This paper examines how adverse selection of investors into a company’s shareholder base affects executive compensation and corporate governance. By embedding the Holmstrom-Milgrom contracting model into a market where investors receive noisy signals about CEO productivity, I show that shareholders who buy into a company’s stock may systematically overvalue CEO ability-a “winner’s curse” phenomenon-despite all participants acting rationally given their information sets. This overvaluation leads to excessive incentive pay that induces inefficiently high CEO effort levels. While firm output increases under these aggressive contracts, the gains fail to offset the additional compensation costs, thereby reducing firm profits-hence the moniker “optimism tax.” These theoretical results raise questions as to the efficacy of shareholder-based governance mechanisms, such as the revised DGCL Section 144 cleansing rules for controlling shareholder transactions, in informationally frictive environments. Turning to data on executive compensation and firm performance from 2000-2025, I conduct a structural estimation of the degree to which investor misperception influences firm outcomes through CEO incentive pay. I find a modest but highly skewed effect of average losses around $5.4 million per firm per year, though median losses per firm remain below $100,000 in all years (both amounts in 2024 dollars). For context, the average loss as a percent of market cap is 0.011%. However, an empirical asset pricing test reveals that a long-short portfolio of low (high) misperceived CEOs achieves a negative and statistically significant abnormal return across standard Fama-French specifications. These findings suggest that the optimism tax is worth paying.
A ‘New View’ of America’s Original Sin: Induced Innovation and Slavery in the Antebellum United States (working paper available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4877471)
This paper provides evidence that slavery directed technological progress in the antebellum South toward labor-augmenting innovations. To detect the relative trends in each region’s investment in technological development, I utilize a natural language processing analysis of U.S. patents granted between the passing of the Patent Act of 1836 and the end of Reconstruction. Contextualizing these results with Atkinson and Stiglitz’s “New View” framework for describing directed technological change, the paper then describes how outsized capital gains on “slave capital” played a pivotal role in altering the overall return to investment in labor-augmenting technologies in the South as compared to the North, thus setting the two regions on different trajectories of industrial development.
Estimating and Correcting for Misclassification Error in Empirical Textual Research, with Jon Choi (working paper available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4913179)
We present a framework for quantifying the impact of and correcting for misclassification error in empirical research involving textual data. Misclassification error commonly arises when, for example, large language models (LLMs) or human research assistants are tasked with classifying features in text. For statistics calculated with classification estimates, misclassification error may introduce attenuation bias from noise, directional bias from an imbalance of false positives and false negatives, or both. We present strategies for statistically quantifying misclassification error and for correcting estimations based on mismeasured data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques with Monte Carlo simulations as well as two worked examples involving real data from LLM classifications. The examples demonstrate the importance of correcting for measurement error, particularly when using LLMs with imbalances in their confusion matrices.
Other
A Matt Levine Effect? (with William Fallon and Nick Foretek), a humorous essay on the difficulty of taking a good vacation, draft dated March 12, 2023
The Gift of the Banya: An Enlightening and Freeing Journey Through the Russian Bath, a review of Bryon MacWilliams’ memoir With Light Steam, New City (2015)
The Poetry of Boundaries, an essay on Vladimir Nabokov’s short stories, The Birch, a Columbia University journal for Eastern European and Eurasian Studies (2011)